Who would've thought a broken
typist chair could be an invaluable parachute training tool? The centre of gravity
on the human body is the belly button, and a curved surface will always face
the airflow. Therefore, to fall in a stable position face down, the body must
be arched with legs spread and slightly bent at the knees, and arms stretched
out and slightly bent at the elbow. We removed the chair back on an old,
wheeled secretarial chair, got the student to lie on the seat in a free fall
position - back arched, head up, arms and legs spread. From there the PJI could spin him around and
correct his technique - simple but very effective.
Another training tool we
invented, was nick-named The Ball-Basher. It was a parachute harness rigged to
a block and tackle which allowed the student to be suspended in a horizontal
position, as if he was in free fall. On the command from the PJI “Two Thousand
Five Hundred Feet – Now,” the student would pull the ripcord, which operated a
suspension device and allowed him to swing under the frame into a vertical
position. This was very like the real thing but without the cold wind blowing
into your face. How did it get its name? Well, if the harness was not fitted
correctly, it could be painful to one’s manhood, especially when cutaways were
practiced and the student would drop a further 300 mm simulating a reserve
opening shock.
All drills could be carried
out on these two pieces of equipment including all the emergency scenarios likely
to be encountered such as a complete main parachute failure, a partial failure,
and damage to the main canopy which would result in the necessity to cut away
and operate the reserve parachute.
With the PJIs fully trained in
free fall jumping, suitable parachutes selected and obtained, and our highly
sophisticated training apparatus invented, we were ready to start training
others. But it was not until October 1971 that PTS began to train SAS Pathfinder teams
Pathfinder Teams: a stick of four
men dropped into an area, from high altitude, towards last light. Their task? To
find a suitable DZ for a follow-up drop of static line troops a night or two
later. These HALO (High Altitude Low
Opening) sticks of SAS men were called Pathfinder teams.
The four-man stick was the
normal size for Rhodesian Forces. But it also suited the training capacity of
the PTS at the time. We only had eight TA parachutes and a small number of TU
modified 28 foot parachutes available for training. There was also a similar shortage
of altimeters and we had no automatic opening devices. I repeat - we had NO automatic opening devices. For these practical reasons alone, it
would not have been possible to train larger groups.
All free fall trainees had to
be volunteers, already fully trained, through the PTS, in static line jumping.
In our optimism, we anticipated the course, with willing, and able recruits, would
only take about a month. This turned out to be unrealistic. Military HALO
parachuting was in its infancy and we were doing it by on the job training.
The course we initially
devised was to contain the following elements: ground training, then the free
fall training itself, and finally advanced techniques.
The ground training phase was
expected to last three days during which time the soldiers would be taught the aircraft
drill, the exit drill, the free fall drill, the flight drill under a
manoeuvrable canopy, and how to turn into wind for a soft landing.
Also included in this phase were
all emergency drills, including the cut away (jettison of main canopy) and the
operation of the reserve parachute. The soldiers were also shown how the
various parachutes worked and had them demonstrated. Altimeters were also explained
in detail by myself . As an aircraft instrument fitter I was well qualified to
explain the workings of these delicate instruments.
In the second phase there
would be 20 free fall parachute jumps. The first and second jumps would be for
a five second delay from 3000 feet AGL and both of these jumps would require
the parachutist to count the seconds before pulling the ripcord. These
paratroopers were carefully observed by PJIs, both on the ground and also from
the rear port seat of the Dakota. The third jump was from 3500 feet AGL with
the parachutist required to watch his altimeter and pull the ripcord at 2500 feet.
This delay was approaching terminal velocity. After this, all jumps would be
from higher altitudes.
In what proved to be our first
error, we assumed all the troops would be able to fall in a stable face to
ground position. We made this judgement based on our trials with the PJIs. But
the PJI was a professional parachutist, whilst, for the soldier, parachuting
was a part time occupation.
In our initial training plan,
we anticipated after the third or fourth free fall, the soldier would not have
any problems going to higher altitudes with longer delays. Up until the fifth
descent the soldiers were required to hold the aircraft heading in free fall,
and it was only after this descent that turns in free fall would be introduced.
Or so we assumed.
After the sixth free fall we
thought the soldiers would be able to carry out turns to the right or left and
to hold given headings as briefed before each jump. Because, we as PJIs had
little trouble doing these various tasks, we assumed the soldiers would also be
able to manage them. Again this was an error.
We thought, after
approximately eight or nine free fall descents, it would be appropriate to introduce
the soldier to the Delta or Tracking position which would enable him to move
around the sky whilst in free fall. The reason for these manoeuvres would be to
avoid other parachutists in the stick as they were falling. Once again we
compared the soldier’s ability to that of the PJI and, once more, we were
mistaken.
This photograph shows Sgt Iain
Bowen during one of the early experimental
HALO parachute jumps whilst carrying a small suspended load behind the
knees and below the main parachute. Later these loads were much larger and weighed
up to 70 kgs. The parachute looks like a T.A. and the reserve can be seen with
the later "sky dive" altimeter mounted on top
Once the tracking phase was mastered it was
time to introduce weapons to our students. We thought this would be at or about
jump number ten or eleven. The first
weapons jump was with an FN.762 rifle fitted to the left hand side of the body.
This made very little difference to the free fall parachutist. It was
anticipated that the soldiers would be given three or four jumps from 8000 feet
to 10,000 feet AGL carrying just the rifle and we hoped any stability problems could
be sorted out during this period.
From about jump number 15 to
the end of the course, which we thought would be 20 jumps, the soldier would be
loaded up with increasingly heavy suspended loads, until he was jumping with
his normal battle load. But we at PTS were expecting too much from the soldiers
who were sent to us for this new form of parachuting.
In the final phase of
training, once the various free fall procedures were mastered, the instructor
could teach advanced flight techniques including: the dive exit, turns in free
fall, tracking, somersaults, watching the altimeter, always watching the
altimeter, pull of the ripcord position, and all the drills required after the
ripcord pull. These drills were practiced over and over, again and again, until
the PJI was satisfied every contingency was covered.
We tested our optimistic plan
during our first free fall course in October 1971. Fortunately, the soldiers
sent to us by the SAS were very capable and it was completed without injury or
real stability problems. But even at this early stage it was obvious - the free
fall courses would have to be extended with training jumps added. In the end
the course was increased to about 6 weeks and approximately 45 jumps - more
than double the number we originally allowed.
We also eliminated the slow
progression of 5 second and 10 second delays. From the third free fall course, the soldier's first free fall parachute
jump was a 45 to 50 second delay to parachute opening. This allowed them to
learn how to fall in the correct position - a more effective learning curve.
It was also evident the
soldiers could not be watched properly either from the ground or from the aircraft
during the free fall phase of the jump. This meant they could not be properly
debriefed and corrections could not be made to their technique.
For this reason we had a free
fall qualified PJI follow each soldier on all delays exceeding 10 seconds. The
PJI landed next to the trainee and
immediately corrected any faults as delays in the debrief and fault correction
analysis reduced their impact. It also meant lots of jumps for the PJI's and an increased workload for those wonderful Safety Equipment Workers. The only drawback was the cold wind blowing down the dispatcher's neck as he directed the pilot to the drop point, minus 40 c was often encountered.
In order to assist the PJI
responsible for the course, the follower PJI also had to write up a critique of
the jumper’s performance as soon as possible after landing. Again, we found
that a delay in this assessment, as often happened if there were a number of
jumps in quick succession, could, and often did, give the wrong impression of
the trainee’s performance.
Due to the shortage of
parachutes in the early days of free fall training, the course was restricted
to about two jumps per day which, in those times, was considered to be the
maximum a soldier could do without a rapid rise in the injury rate. This ruling
was a hangover from the original PJI course at RAF Abingdon in the UK, where we
were told quite emphatically, that a parachute jump was equivalent to eight hours
of hard work. If more than two jumps in a day were carried out, the injury rate
would soar out of control.
This was later proved to be a
figment of some expert’s imagination, especially during the days of Fire Force
when up to three jumps a day, into battle was not uncommon. At first, however,
the main restriction was a lack of parachutes. Safety Equipment was always
responsible for the packing of all our parachutes and was kept extremely busy
with a limited staff in the early days.
HALO jumping was just the
means of getting the Pathfinder Team onto the ground. From there, their real
work started - to find a suitable Drop Zone for a later deployment of
paratroopers. It was also the job of the PTS to teach them how to find this DZ,
and then how to guide aircraft in for an accurate drop of static line
parachutes. Details of this will be covered in the next chapter.
No comments:
Post a Comment